How they worked
How a student works through the lesson: the pace, the pattern, and where the effort went. Detected from the work, never inferred about the person.
Evidence
Every lesson ends in evidence, not just a grade
Every lesson records how the student worked with AI, including every exchange, and closes with an Evidence Summary faculty review and attest.
What is captured
What each lesson records
Mizain captures the work as it happens: how students engage, what they produce, and how they explain it back.
What they produced
The work the student produced, with the AI assistance behind each piece made visible.
In their own voice
Your students explain the idea back in their own words, recorded at the close of the lesson and reviewed against your criteria.
Faculty decide
Nothing consequential is decided from the record alone. The faculty member reviews the Evidence Summary and attests it.
The Evidence Summary
What a faculty member actually receives
How the student worked, what they produced, the AI assistance behind it, how they explained the idea, and any open flags. Never a single score. While a flag is open, the lesson shows Under Review.
You set what each lesson looks for and the criteria it is reviewed against. Every figure links back to the recorded work beneath it.
A record the student keeps
Each lesson leaves a record the faculty member attests and the student keeps. Every figure in it traces back to the recorded work: the attempts, the AI exchanges and the student's own explanation.
Faculty can open any figure and see the work behind it, and nothing consequential is decided until they attest it. Students carry the record forward as evidence of how they learned, not only what they submitted.
Map your rubric to what Mizain measures
Bring the rubric you already use. We will show how its criteria map to the Evidence Summary a lesson produces, so the course keeps its standards and gains its evidence.